نوع مقاله : علمی- ترویجی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار گروه حقوق خصوصی دانشگاه علم و فرهنگ
2 کارشناسی ارشد حقوق بشر دانشگاه تهران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Having an independent name can be considered as one of the symbols of self –independency and autonomy; since the independent person is enjoying the benefit of an independent name. From this perspective, both Iranian and American legal systems have developed an effort to grant women the benefit of an independent name to be recognized as a part of their individual identity. However it has not always been this way. In the American legal system, even till the beginning of the 70s of the 20th century, the family name of a woman automatically changed to that of the husband's by marriage. In the Iranian legal system, although there is no evidence of the imposition of the husband's family name on the wife, in fact, till 1355, it was the man who chose the surname of his family including his wife. Both legal systems have developed during recent decades; In beginning of the 1970's to support women independence the American legal system gave women the freedom to keep their maiden name or choose their husband family name. Also, in the Iranian legal system, since all people can choose their family names, there is no more imposition on behalf of the husband regarding his wife's change in family name. Based on a comparative approach, the present essay studies the legal regime governing the name-changed in both Iranian and American legal systems.
کلیدواژهها [English]
|
v Claudia, Goldin & Shim Maria, Making a Name: Women’s Surnames at Marriage and beyond, 18 J. ECON. PERSP. P. 140–45 (2004) v Coquillette, Daniel R. The Legal Education of a Patriot: Josiah Quincy Jr.’s Law Commonplace, 39 ARIZ. ST. L.J. P.317- 346 (2007). v Doll, Cynthia Blevins, Harmonizing Filial and Parental Rights in Names: Progress, Pitfalls, and Constitutional Problems, 35 HOW. L.J. P. 227-239 (1992). v Emens, Elizabeth F. Changing Name Changing: Framing Rules and the Future of Marital Names, The University of Chicago Law Review, Vol.74, Number.3, REV. P.761-783, (2007). v Frandina, Michael Mahoney, A Man’s Right to Choose His Surname in Marriage: a Proposal, Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy Volume 16:155.p. 155-169(2009) v Gorence, Patricia J. Women's Name Rights, Marquette Law Review, Volume 59, Issue 4, P.850-883.(1976). v Kelly, Lisa, Divining the Deep and Inscrutable: Toward a Gender-Neutral, Child-Centered Approach to Child Name Change Proceedings, 99 W. VA. L. REV. 1, 9 .p.225-274(1996). v Lamber, Julia C. A Married Woman’s Surname: Is Custom Law? Washington University Law Review, Volume 4, P.779-818 (1973) v Leissner, Omi Morgenstern, The Name of the Maiden, 12 WIS. WOMEN‘S L.J. P.253-263(1997) v Ritterbusch, Catherine A., In the Name of the Father: Wisconsin's Antiquated Approach to Child Name Changes in Post-Divorce and Paternity Proceedings, Marquette Law, vol.83. P.279-297 (1999) v Rosensaft, Michael, Comment, The Right of Men to Change Their Names upon Marriage, 5 U. PA. J. CONST. L. 186, P.193–94 (2002). v Scheuble, Laurie K. & David R. Johnson, Women’s Marital Naming in Two Generations: A National Study, 57 J. MARRIAGE & FAM. P.724-727 (1995) v Siegel, Reva B. She the People: The Nineteenth Amendment, Sex Equality, Federalism, and the Family, HARV. L. REV. 115 n.101. P.947- 983 (2002) v Snyder, Kelly, All Names Are Not Equal: Choice of Marital Surname and Equal Protection, Journal of Law & Policy [Vol. 30, P.561-587(2009) v Spencer, Margaret Eve, A Woman's Right to Her Name, 21 UCLA L. REV. P.665-684 (1973) v Twenge, Jean M. “Mrs. His Name”: Women’s Preferences for Married Names, 21 PSYCH. WOMEN Q. P.417-425 (1997). v Weiner, Merle H. We Are Family: Valuing Associationalism in Disputes over Children’s Surnames, 75 N.C. L. REV. 1625, P.1735–1760 (1997)
|
)