Jurisprudential and legal examination of the validity of suspending the marriage contract

One of the conditions discussed by jurists and jurists in the accuracy of the marriage is that it is suspended by the marriage that has been disputed by jurists and jurists. Suspension has different types, including suspension in essay and origin and belong to the origin. Given the importance of the subject of marriage and its suspension works on the one hand and the various verdicts of the marriage contract and the dispersal of the opinions and its views are necessary, it is necessary for the purpose of the present article to examine the suspension in the marriage contract in jurisprudence.

Most jurisprudents believe in the validity of the marriage contract in the origin. But there are two views on the suspension in the essay and the source of the jurisprudence. Some jurisprudents consider suspension in the essay, but suspension in the origin, and some have the opposite. Each one has also resorted to the legitimacy and validity of their views for rational and religious reasons.

In this study, the votes of jurists and jurists have been explored and suspended in marriage. By the way of the jurisprudence, most of them are believing in the authenticity of the marriage contract in the origin and origin of the marriage, and made arguments that the marriage suspension is valid in these two cases, which has been criticized.