Assessing Students' Attitudes in Mashhad Towards Dowry (Mahr) and Its Legal Developments

Document Type : Scholarly Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran

2 PhD student in Sociology, Social Studies of Iran, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Mahr, or dowry, is a sum of money or other property that a man is obliged to pay to his wife upon marriage. In the Iranian family law system, women, in their role as wives, enjoy certain privileges and rights, the most significant of which are dowry and alimony. Consequently, claims for dowry constitute one of the most common and numerous types of lawsuits in family law. Over the past decade, legislature and judicial authorities have made considerable efforts to change the rules and regulations of dowry. This research aims to evaluate and analyze students' attitudes toward the current and ideal status of dowry, and to use the findings to determine an optimal legislative approach in this area. The research employs a descriptive-survey method, utilizing questionnaires for data collection. The statistical population includes all students from universities in Mashhad, with 327 valid questionnaires analyzed for this purpose. The research findings indicate that, regarding life priorities, the most significant item is “ethics”, followed by “family”. In terms of the reasons and philosophy behind determining the dowry at the time of marriage, as well as its practical function within families, the primary importance is attributed to “financial support for a woman after the dissolution of marriage due to divorce or the death of her husband”. The most important strategies for changing the current status of dowry are identified as “promoting cultural awareness to change societal customs regarding dowry”, followed by “reducing the tendency to set high dowries through legal reforms aimed at increasing women's rights in family relationships”. Therefore, the current approach of legislative and judicial authorities regarding changes to the rules governing dowry (primarily by reducing the enforcement mechanisms for dowry claims) stands in stark contrast to the expected approach of the study's respondents, highlighting a disregard by these institutions for the demands and needs of society.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Ahmadieh, M (2003), Balance between rights and ethics in the family, Women's Socio-Cultural Council, Tehran. [in Persian]
  2. Asadipour S., Haghighatian M., Arsalani Moghaddam E. (2012), “Investigating the Social Factors Impacting the Claim on the ‎Marriage Portion by the Newly-marriage Females of Shahrekord ‎City in 2010”‎, Journal of woman and study of family, 4/15 : 13-42. [in Persian]
  3. Askari-Nodoushan A. & Rasoulzadeh T. (2011), “Attitude towards the role of Mahr in maintaining family stability: Survey findings in Yazd city”, Journal of population association of Iran, 6/12: 76-101. [in Persian]
  4. Farahzadi A & Ebrahimi J (2020), “Reconsideration of Inference of Family Rules According to the Principle of Family Strength”, Women's strategic studies. 22: 79-105. [in Persian]
  5. Ghorban Nia N (2013), Reflection on jurisprudence; Evolution in law, Mizan publication, Tehran. [in Persian]
  6. Iranian Sociological Association (2018), “Study on social and legal dimensions of dowry”, Report of the meeting on the study of women's social issues, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran. [in Persian]
  7. Katouzian N (2006), Philosophy of Law; Volume I, Definition and nature of rights, Enteshar publication. [in Persian]
  8. Katouzian N (2013), Civil law; Family law, Enteshar publication. [in Persian]
  9. Katouzian N (2015), A step towards justice, Mizan publication. [in Persian]
  10. Kazemipour Sh (2008), “The increase of the average dowry from 300 to 450 coins in the last five years”, ISNA, interview published on February 2, 2009, accessible at: https://www.isna.ir/news/8711-08338.92095. [in Persian]
  11. Makarem Shirazi N. (1992), Nemooneh interpretation, Volume 3, Dar al-Kotob al-Islamiyyah, Tehran. [in Persian]
  12. Mehrpur H., Tafreshi M.I., Abdali M. (2001), “Legal Enforcement of Morality”, Comparative law Research Quarterly. Volume 5, Issue 4: 125-140. [in Persian]
  13. Mohaghegh Damad S.M (1995), “Basics of adaptability of Islamic laws with social changes”, Naqd va Nazar, 5: 80-86. [in Persian]
  14. Motahhari M (2017), Women's rights system in Islam, Sadra publication. [in Persian]
  15. Mozaffari M. (2009), “Levying Tax on Marriage Portion and Its Effects on Family Institution”, Journal of family research, 4: 553-564. [in Persian]
  16. Rasoulzadeh T (2011), “Examining the attitude towards the social functions of dowry in Yazd”, Master's thesis in sociology, Yazd University. [in Persian]
  17. Safai S.H & Emami A (2020), A concise of family law, Mizan publication. [in Persian]
  18. Safiri K., Vadad Hir A, Talebi Ardakani S. (2009), “The Social & Cultural Construction Of The Issue Of Mehriyeh In IRAN: A Qualitative Research On Women Involved In The Issue In SHIRAZ”, Social sciences, 16/44: 89-121. [in Persian]
  19. Seyed Mirzaie S.M. & Raoof A. (2010), “A survey on population and social aspects of marriage portion in Iran (A case of Tehran city)”, Journal of Iranian Social developement studies, 1/3: 145-178. [in Persian]
  20. Seyfi Farsi S. (2017), Studying the deterrent role of dowry in divorce: a comparative study of divorced and married women in Shiraz, Master's thesis in demography, Yazd University. [in Persian]
  21. Statistics and Information Technology Center of Judiciary (2017), judicial units performance report. [in Persian]
  22. Statistics and Information Technology Center of Judiciary (2019), judicial units performance report. [in Persian]
  23. Tabatabaei S.M.H (1995), Translation of Tafsir al-Mizan, Volume 4, Islamic Publications Office, Qom. [in Persian]
  24. Tavassoli A., Fouladi L., Amanolahi M. (2015), “Sociological Study of The Attitudes toward Mehr Among Alameh University Students”, Journal of Social-Psychological Studies of Women, 12/4 : 43-68. [in Persian]
  25. Vaziri Fard S.M.J & Fallah Tafti, F. (2013), “Judicial Review and Solutions for Marriage Portion Reduction”, Family Law and Jurisprudence Journal. 18: 1-27. [in Persian]
  26. Yousef Zadeh, H. (2005), “A Sociological Study of Dowry”, Women's strategic studies. 27: 48-75. [in Persian]