Identifying the Legal Nature of Shirbaha with Emphasis on Judicial Procedure

Document Type : Scholarly Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor in Department of Law in University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran

2 PhD Student in Private Law in University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran

Abstract

Preparation of essentials for common life is one of the legal duties of man; However, in some regions, according to the custom, dowry is provided by the wife. Meanwhile, the man prepares a few items of necessary accessories for common life, which usually have significant material value, to be included in the list of dowry and along with the other items, is sent to the common house. In custom, such items are called Shirbaha. In the dowry restitution lawsuit, the court will face the challenging question of who is considered the owner of this property? The answer to the question depends on the explanation of the nature of the agreement. There is a difference regarding the nature of the Shirbaha from a jurisprudential and legal point of view. Some have interpreted it in the form of specific contracts such as gift, granted and peace, and others consider it in the form of a private agreement. A group has also interpreted its nature as a condition in the contract as well as an obligation for the benefit of a third party. These disputes have also affected the judicial procedure. Referring to the formats which is mentioned and according to the interpretation of the permissibility or necessity of the Shirbaha, some jurists consider these items to belong to the husband and some others to the wife. This research shows that the above- mentioned formats have obvious distinctions with the Shirbaha despite having some proportion. The Shirbaha has a special nature that according to its characteristics and the silence of the law, custom determines the scope of its effects.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  • Afshar, A., Movahedi Nia, M., & Gholipour, A. (2019). Analysis of the nature and permissibility of “shirbaha” (bride-price) from the perspective of Imami jurisprudence and positive law. Islamic Studies of Women and Family, 6(10), 48-64.
  • Alavi Gorgani, M. A. (2005). Ajwibat al-Masa’il. Office of Ayatollah Alavi Gorgani Publications.
  • Al-Sharif, M. M. (2021). Legal logic. Company Sahami Enteshar.
  • Behjat, M. T. (2007). Estefta’at. Office of Grand Ayatollah Behjat Publications.
  • Deyani, A. (2008). Family law. Mizan Legal Foundation.
  • Emami, S. H. (2019). Civil law. Islamieh Publications.
  • Golpayegani, M. R. (2001). Majma’ al-Masa’il. Dar al-Qur’an al-Karim.
  • Hashemi Shahroudi, S. M. (2003). Fiqhh encyclopedia according to the school of Ahlulbayt. Encyclopedia of Islamic Jurisprudence Institute.
  • Jafari Langarudi, M. J. (2021a). Legal terminology. Ganj Danesh Library.
  • Jafari Langarudi, M. J. (2021b). Annotated collection of the Civil Code. Ganj Danesh Library.
  • Judicial Research Institute. (n.d.). National judicial opinions platform. https://ara.jri.ac.ir
  • Katouzian, N. (2008). Introductory course in civil family law. Mizan Legal Foundation.
  • Katouzian, N. (2019). Philosophy of law. Ganj Danesh Library.
  • Katouzian, N. (2021a). Civil family law course. Ganj Danesh Library.
  • Katouzian, N. (2021b). Civil law course on specific contracts (Partnership, Peace). Ganj Danesh Library.
  • Khomeini, R. (2013). Tahrir al-Wasilah. Institute for Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini’s Works.
  • Mafi, H., Zahouri, S., & Farzanegan, M. (2016). The jurisprudential-legal status of disputes between spouses regarding household furnishings. Sadegh’s Voice: Biannual Journal of Family Law and Jurisprudence, 21(65), 83-106.
  • Makarem Shirazi, N. (2003a). Kitab al-Nikah. Madrasat al-Imam Ali ibn Abi Talib.
  • Makarem Shirazi, N. (2003b). Fiqh Istidlali. Madrasat al-Imam Ali ibn Abi Talib.
  • Makarem Shirazi, N. (2006). Estefta’at. Madrasat al-Imam Ali ibn Abi Talib.
  • Mirza Qomi, A. ibn M. H. (2006). Rasa’il al-Mirza al-Qomi. Bustan-e-Ketab Publishing.
  • Moein, M. (2007). Moein dictionary (A. A. Alizadeh, Compiler). Adena Publications.
  • Mohaghegh Damad, M. (2018). General theory of conditions and obligations in Islamic law. Islamic Science Publishing Center.
  • Mohaghegh Damad, M. (2019). General theory of conditions and obligations in Islamic law. Islamic Science Publishing Center.
  • Mowrouj, H. (2000). Fiqh terminology. Bakhshayesh.
  • Rouhani, S. (2004). Estefta’at. Hadith Del Publishing.
  • Safai, S. H., & Emami, A. (2011). A concise guide to family law. Mizan Legal Foundation.
  • Shahidi, M. (2009). Principles of contracts and obligations. Majd Publishing.
  • Shariat Mousavi, M. (2006). Al-Shihab fi Mas’ala al-Hijab. Dar al-Tafsir.