Feasibility of Claiming of Loss due to Loss of Alimony Position

Articles in Press

Document Type : Scholarly Article

Authors

1 Department of Law, Faculty of Humanities and Sciences, Bo Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Imam Sadegh University, Sisters Campus

Abstract

One of the fundamental principles of civil liability law, which is approved by the majority of lawyers and judicial systems, is the principle of the necessity of compensating for damages, or the principle of full compensation for damages.  Based on this, there is no difference of opinion regarding the compensation for the loss caused by the loss of the object or benefit or the damage caused to the human personality, but regarding being deprived of benefits, this question arises as to whether the benefits that are lost as a result of the disruption of a practical position remains whether the benefits that are lost as a result of the disruption of a practical position can be claimed as a loss?One of the obvious examples of damage to the practical position of people is when, due to the harmful act of a third party, the position resulting from the benefit of alimony is lost. In this article, with a descriptive-analytical method, aims to explain the possibility of claiming a loss due to the loss of the position of benefiting from alimony.There is a difference of opinion among jurists regarding the possibility or impossibility of claiming damages due to the loss of the position of benefiting from alimony. Some believe in the impossibility of claiming such a loss, and others do not see any particular obstacle in claiming the loss due to the loss of position inspired by French law.In this thesis, after examining and studying both opinions, an opinion was adopted and strengthened, according to which, the loss caused by the loss of position, in the assumption of creating a continuous position as a legal right and also in the assumption of creating an unstable position as a profit opportunity will be claimed.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Al Quran Al Karim.
Akhund Khorasani, M. (1945). Kifayat al-Usul. Tehran: Islamic bookstore. vol2.
Abdolsamadi, R., Honardost, A., & Javan, S. (2016). concept of natural obligations and their relationship to moral obligation. The judiciary law journal, 80(93), 194-214.
Ansari, M. Fuatah al –rhumot. Beirut: Dar al-Fekr.
Ansari, M. (1990). Faraid al – Asul. Qom: Society of teachers.
Badini, H., & Aghdastinat, H. R. (2017). An Analysis of Normal Risks of Life and their Role in Scope of Tort Law. Judicial law views quarterly, 22(77.78), 1-40.
Bahari ardakani, A., Hashemi bajgani, J., & Salimian, A. (2016). Civil Liability Arising From Losing The Chance. Quarterly majlis and rahbord, 23(86), 69-84.
Barikloo, R. (2020). Civil responsibility. Tehran: Mizan.
Ebn fars, A. (2008). Tartibo Maghaisologhe. Qom: Hawza Studies Center and University.
  Flour, J. (2009). Les obligations. Le rapport d'obgations. Vol3.
Ghafi, H., Shariati, S. (2019). Applied principles of eslamic jurisprudence. Tehran: Samt publication. vol2.
Jafari Langerodi, M. J. (2002). Encyclopedia of eslamic science. Tehran: Ganjedanesh.
Jafarzadeh, S., & Alizadeh, H. (2020). A comparative study on the legal nature and the conditions of eligibility to pay alimony to relatives in Iranian and British. Fmaily law and Jurisprudence Journal, 25(73), 282-261.
Katouzian, N. (2020). Extra –Contractual  Obligation Civil Liability. Tehran: Mizan obligation. Vol1.
Katouzian, N. (2020). Civil rights, general theori of obligation. Tehran: Mizan.
Alidoost,  A. (2007). The possibility of understanding the materials and corruptions intended by the Shariah. Journal of Islamic Law, 1(8), 60-39.
Mazead, H., Chabas, F. (1991). leçons de droit civil obligations. paris: Montchrestien.
Mohaghegh Damad, M. (2021). The general theory of negation of difficulty in eslamic law. Tehran: Islamic Sciences Publishing Center.
Mohaghegh Damad, M. (2018). The rules of islamic jurisprudence, civil section. Tehran: Islamic Sciences Publishing Center.
Mohannadi, M. (2020). The rules of islamic jurisprudence. Tehran: Mizan.
Mosavi Khomeini, R. (1986). Rasael. Qom: Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance.
Mozafar, M. R. (1991). Princple of jurisprudence. Qom: Advertising office.
Patrice, J. (2014). Principes de responsabilité civile. Traduction et recherche par Majid, A. Téhéran: maison d'édition Mizan.
Safai, H., Rahimi, H. (2021). Civil law (Non-contractual obligations). Tehran: Mizan.
Sanhouri, A. (1998). Al-wasit in the discription of new civil law. Beirut: Al-Halabi.
Savatier, R. (1950). Treatise on civil liability in French law. Paris: general library of law and case law.
ZaineDin, A. (1993). Masalak al-afham fi sharh share al-eslam. Qom: Islamic encyclopedia. vol12.
Sokouti, R., & Shemal, N. (2010). The position of loss of profirt in iranian legal sysytem. Contemporary comprative legal studeis, 1(2), 79-98.
Tabtabai, A. (2020). Riyaz al –masael. Tehran:  Islamic Publication Institute. vol12.
Tusi, M. (1986). Al-khilaf. Qom: Islamic Publication Institute.
Viney, G., & Jourdain, p. (1998). Treatise on Civil Law. The conditions of civil liability. Paris: General Library of Law and Jurisprudence.
Viney, G., Jourdian, P. (1998). Traité de Droit civil.Les conditoins de la responsabilité civile. Paris: Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence.
Viney, G. (1988). Traité de Droit civil. les obligation la responsabilité. Paris: Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence. Vol 1-2.
Yathrebi, A. M., & Mhmoudi, J. (2018). Proving the judgment by no-harm rule. Islamic jurisprudence reasesrch, 14(1), 105-125.
Yazdanian, A. R. (2020). Public rules of civil liability. Tehran: Mizan. Vol1.
Zakeri, A. (2011). Civil liability due to loss of opportunity. (Master's Thesis. Imam Sadiq University.Tehran.Iran).  Retrieved from https://library.ut.ac.ir/fa.                          
Biannual Journal of Family Law And Jurisprudence

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 29 November 2022

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics